Jayei Sara 2025 (VIDEO) / Everything you need to know about reincarnation in Judaism

Date:

Share:

Parashah Jayei Sarah (“The life of Sarah”) and reincarnation (גילגול הנשמות) in judaism

1) Context of the torah portion (Genesis 23:1-25:18)

  • Axes narrative: death and burial of Sarah in Majpelá; management of Abraham to purchase a burial; sending Eliezer to find a wife for Yitzchak; arrival of Rivká; death of Abraham and this is the genealogy of Ishmael.
  • Key themes: although it deals with the death of Sarah, the title is “lives of Sarah”, which the exegesis classic used to talk of the continuity of the soul and the spiritual influence beyond the biography body. Midrash Bereishit Rabbah 58 points out the unique formulation “one hundred years ago, twenty-seven” as an indication of spiritual integrity in every stage.
  • Reading kabbalistic: the continuity of Sarah in Rivká (parallel modesty, kindness and miracles domestic) is interpreted not as “the same person”, but as affinity root of soul (שורש הנשמה) and transmission of spiritual spark (ניצוץ), categories, close to —but not identical— to the doctrine of gilgul.

VIDEO PARASHAH JAYEI SARA 2025 IN SPANISH


2) What is reincarnation in jewish sources?

  • Term: Gilgul ha-neshamot = “rolling/moving of souls”.
  • The technical distinction:
    • Gilgul: return of the soul into another body to complete corrections (תיקון) or missions.
    • Ibur (“gestation/membership”): adding a temporary spark another soul to help on a spiritual duty; it does not replace the primary identity.
    • Dibuk: the phenomenon of anomalous in literature of late; there is no central doctrine and is usually treated in key ethical or musar.
  • Status doctrinal: it is not a principle of faith required. The 13 Principles of Rambam does not include it. Within traditional judaism, is a opinion accepted by the mystical and a good part of the thought pietist posmedieval, but discussed by rationalists.

VIDEO PARASHAH JAYEI SARA 2025 IN ENGLISH


3) Sources: where it appears (or not) the reincarnation?

3.1 Tanakh (Hebrew Bible)

  • Not explicitly formulates a doctrine of reincarnation.
  • Texts used by kabbalists as “evidence” (reading doesn't peshat):
    • Quohelet/Ecclesiastes 1:4 “A generation goes and another comes...” (cyclicity).
    • Job 33:29-30 “All of this makes God... two and three times with the man, to bring back his soul from the pit...” (re-readings of mystical).
    • Deut 25:5-10 (yibbum, levirate): “lift up the name of the brother” is interpreted esoterically as tikkun the soul of the deceased is not the legal sense, plain).

3.2 Talmud and Midrash

  • Talmud: it does not teach reincarnation as a doctrine. Addresses resurrection (תחיית המתים) and pay post-mortal (e.g., Sanhedrin 90b–92a), and the personal identity and responsibility.
  • Midrashim: language about “lives” that persist in offspring and on the “merits of the fathers” (זכות אבות). Some passages are used by kabbalists as supports homiléticos patterns of return or spiritual continuity.

3.3 Cabal classic and posmedieval

  • Sefer ha-Bahir (XII–XIII centuries): first clear testimony of gilgul in the jewish literature.
  • Zohar (especially Mishpatim, Zohar II): develops systematically gilgul, ibbur, tikkun and correlation between acts, and returns.
  • Ramban (Nachmanides): its commentary biblical and other writings hint concepts cognate to the root of souls and corrections (without a “manual” systematic).
  • Rabbeinu Bajyé ben Asher and other exegetes kabbalists in medieval: occasional references.
  • Arizal (R. Yitzchak Luria, s. XVI) via R. Chaim Vital, Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim: encoding the doctrine: causes of gilgul, structures soul (nefesh-ruach-neshama), missions, couples, tikkunim and modes (incl. ibbur).
  • Jasidismo (EIGHTEENTH century onward, e.g., the Baal Shem Tov) and school Lithuanian mysticism (e.g., Vilna Gaon): accepted and used gilgul key ethical and spiritual.

4) How to connect Jayei Sarah with gilgul and tikkun

  1. Title paradoxical (“lives” in the plural) → reading of the spiritual life of Sarah continues in his lineage and in the works inspired by it.
  2. Purchase of Majpelá: anchor memory and continuity of the people on earth—a “fixation” that, in reading the mystical facilitates tikkunim generational.
  3. Rivká as the continuity of Sarah: parallel tzniut and goodness (Midrash; Rashi). The Kabbalah speaks of common roots of soul or nitzotzot that manifests itself in different people and times.
  4. Marriage of Yitzchak and Rivká: union, which “amends” (מתקן) routes of souls, patriarchal, and opens the way to Yaakov and the tribes.

5) Arguments to please reincarnation in judaism

  • (A1) consistent with divine justice: gilgul explains why people face tests or talents that are not apparent on its merits/demes; allows corrections through several lives. (Zohar; Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim).
  • (A2) Architecture of the soul: model nefesh-ruach-neshamawith layers capable of partially or fully return (ibbur for specific missions).
  • (A3) Continuity of identities spiritual: explains resonances of character and mission between generations (e.g., affinities Sarah–Rivká; echoes prophetic).
  • (A4) esoteric Tradition stable: from Bahir-Zohar the Arizalpassing by schools jasídicas and Lithuanian, there is consensus mystic broad (though not halachic) on gilgul.
  • (A5) Reading passages: rereadings of Job 33 and Quohelet 1 as evidence of cycles; yibbum as tikkun of the deceased.

6) Arguments against within judaism

  • (C1) Silence/absence biblical and talmudic: it is not a doctrine revealed explicit in the Tanakh nor established by the Talmud.
  • (C2) Rationalism medieval:
    • Saadia Gaon, Emunot ve-Deot: rejects the transmigration by incompatible with the justice and personal responsibility (the penalty or reward for acts of “another life” dilutes the imputation).
    • Maimonides (Rambam): not mentioned and his anthropology of the soul (prevarications) does not fit with returns multiple individual; their 13 Principles prioritize resurrection, not gilgul.
    • Yosef Albo, Sefer ha-Ikkarim: critical ideas not rooted in revelation/talmud and that complicate the remuneration.
  • (C3) Problems of identity and halacha: jewish law is based on the the current person; gilgul not generated legal status separate and repealing council responsibilities.
  • (C4) Risk theological: move the ethics this to “future lives” may to weaken the moral urgency.
  • (C5) the Adequacy of other categories: reward/punishment post-mortal and resurrection suffice to sustain the divine justice without requiring transmigration.

7) Map doctrinal: positions for currents

  • Cabal classic and luriánica: claims gilgul and systematizes (Bahir, Zohar, Arizal/Chaim Vital – Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim).
  • Jasidismo (Baal Shem Tov and disciples) and mystical Lithuanian (e.g., the Vilna Gaon): used pastorally (tikkun speech, of character, of mitzvot omitted).
  • Rationalist medieval (Saadia, Rambam, Albo): reject or what ignored as improper.
  • Orthodoxy contemporary: what tolerates as a belief valid within the mystical tradition; it is not ikkar.
  • Conservative/Reformist: diversity; it is generally considered optional or symbolic.

8) practical Implications (ethical and study)

  • It is not halachah: does not dictate the rules of law.
  • Ethical use-education: emphasis on tikkun of the character (midot), repair of damage and care of the living.
  • Reading Jayei Sarah: live in a way that the spiritual influence transcend (the “lives” of Sarah) more than speculate about “who I was”.

9) Guía de estudio

  1. Tanakh: Genesis 23-25; Quohelet 1; Job 33:23-30; Deut 25:5-10.
  2. Talmud: Sanhedrin 90b–92a (resurrection); Yevamot (yibbum; continuity of the “name”).
  3. Midrash: Bereishit Rabbah 58-60 (the life of Sarah, virtues of Rivká).
  4. Cabal:
    • Sefer ha-Bahir (sections on souls, and returns).
    • Zohar, parashat Mishpatim (treated gilgul/ibbur).
    • R. Chaim Vital, Sha'ar ha-Gilgulim (intros 1-4 and chapters on the causes of gilgul).
  5. Rationalists:
    • Saadia Gaon, Emunot ve-Deot (critique of the transmigration).
    • Maimonides: Mishné Torah, Hilchot Teshuvah; Guide of the Perplexed (anthropology of the soul; without gilgul).
    • Yosef Albo, Sefer ha-Ikkarim (objections philosophical).
  6. Commentators medieval: Ramban (innuendo mystical), Rabbeinu Bajyé (references to spiritual).
  7. Laterliterature chassidic (Baal Shem Tov) and Lithuanian (teachings attributed to the Gra).

10) Conclusion

  • The Torah and the Talmud does not teach explicitly reincarnation.
  • The Cabal (of Bahir the Arizal) the articulates as mechanism of tikkun and spiritual teaching.
  • The rationalists (Saadia, Rambam, Albo) the reject or ignore for reasons of revelation, justice and personal identity.
  • In the judaism policy, gilgul is opinion allowed and extended in areas mystics, not a principle of faith required.
  • Jayei Sarah it offers a theological framework: the life of Sarah continues in the work and the offspring; more to prove reincarnation, teaches spiritual continuity and ethical responsibility in the present.
Abel
Abelhttps://lamishna.com
Abel Flores is a journalist and researcher -for more than 20 years - at the intersection between the history and the sacred mysteries metaphysical. Their work delves into the Mishnah, the Bible and the Kabbalah, exploring the codes, contexts and hidden dimensions that connect the biblical tradition and rabbinic with the evolution of spiritual and philosophical in the world. It combines academic rigor with a look critically and analytically, revealing the links between theology, religion, power and ancient knowledge.
spot_img

Related articles